Comments on: Made in Britain? Not so much/2013/03/18/made-in-britain-not-so-much/Andrew Curry's blog on futures, trends, emerging issues and scenariosFri, 12 Apr 2013 13:57:06 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.com/By: ‘Freedom’, ‘choice’, and zombie capitalism | thenextwave/2013/03/18/made-in-britain-not-so-much/#comment-4394Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:57:06 +0000/?p=3355#comment-4394[…] oil revenues on tax giveaways and unemployment benefit rather than investing it in infrastructure (as Norway did). Economic growth under Thatcher is less than Britain’s long-run average (2% a year), which […]

]]>
By: thenextwavefutures/2013/03/18/made-in-britain-not-so-much/#comment-4358Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:34:58 +0000/?p=3355#comment-4358Michael Smith, of Red Page Consulting , sent an interesting comment on this by email:

It’s not surprising. Ministers and others are very good at saying manufacturing is increasing. The question is what do THEY mean by manufacturing? A Britain based on assembling other countries’ prefab products is not what I call manufacturing – all that will ever do is put us in competition with low wage assembly economies. Vision is key. Alas, the current policy of “off the shelf, cheapest price” purchasing (e.g. in the defence sector) shows that politicians currently have no vision and thus we lose even more capability. Also, if we don’t buy what we make then it’s a sure thing that no-one else will either. Still, on the plus side, it’s interesting to see that Peugeot is in deep trouble which goes to show that even the French policy of “screw everyone else” is not foolproof.

While probably not possible in high investment areas such as defence, the key is not to go and list on the stock exchange. JCB and Triumph both are huge successes and they’re not publicly listed. You can guarantee that if they were, they’d have been asset stripped by now.

]]>