Comments on: Fighting over democracy/2015/07/20/fighting-over-democracy/Andrew Curry's blog on futures, trends, emerging issues and scenariosWed, 22 Jun 2016 18:49:40 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.com/By: The EU referendum and the England problem | thenextwave/2015/07/20/fighting-over-democracy/#comment-6243Wed, 22 Jun 2016 18:49:40 +0000/?p=4756#comment-6243[…] not have one of Polly Toynbee’s famous clothes pegs over your nose as you approach the EU. Peter Mair’s argument that the EU has the form of a democratic organisation but none of the substance is hard to argue […]

]]>
By: syndax vuzz/2015/07/20/fighting-over-democracy/#comment-5960Sat, 15 Aug 2015 09:45:40 +0000/?p=4756#comment-5960Reblogged this on syndax vuzz.

]]>
By: Fassreifen (@Fassreifen)/2015/07/20/fighting-over-democracy/#comment-5959Fri, 14 Aug 2015 11:16:54 +0000/?p=4756#comment-5959Core-periphery distinction doesn’t really work with phenomena like globablisation. It presumes there’s a core that benefits from it. Very few do. A distinction between the 1% and the 99% is more accurate. We’re almost all (the 99%) “peripheralised” by neoliberalism.

]]>
By: Ellie Kesselman/2015/07/20/fighting-over-democracy/#comment-5954Sun, 26 Jul 2015 11:10:25 +0000/?p=4756#comment-5954Two other thoughts: An American analog of your Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, David Stockman, wrote an article full of genuine praise for Syriza and Tsipras, for leading Greece toward democracy rather than continued loss of sovereignty to a multinational monetary regime.

Next, regarding Paul Mason: He astutely observed that the breakdown in the ECB and EC negotiations with elected Eurogroup finance ministers, about Greece, was due to democracy. https://twitter.com/EllieAsksWhy/status/615348570619838464
I read the excerpt of Paul Mason’s ‘Post-Capitalism’ too. I was not as impressed by that. In fact, economists and many others HAVE noticed “parallel currencies, time banks, cooperatives and self-managed spaces”. Yes, the so-called sharing economy and freelance workforce has grown out of of the shattering of the old structures in the post-2008 crisis. The bleak future for college graduates and skilled tradesman, now with careers as day laborers/piece workers (e.g. Task Rabbits or Uber drivers), hired by the minute by the elite beneficiaries of globalization, is due to the shattering of the GOOD structures that existed prior to 2008. Many of the old, bad structures, such as weakened manufacturing and unions while GDP was concentrated increasingly in the financial industry, have survived post-2008. Reforms have been minimal.

]]>
By: Ellie Kesselman/2015/07/20/fighting-over-democracy/#comment-5953Sun, 26 Jul 2015 10:45:19 +0000/?p=4756#comment-5953Do you truly believe that the first group, those who have lost out from the long wave of globalisation, are more effective at mobilising support? (I am uncertain what you mean by support, admittedly.) Those who have gained a great deal from globalization are the elites, both organizations and oligarch-like wealthy individuals. They have political influence, money, property and control (much of) the means of production. Ian Christie’s scenario 3 group is not in a position of strength, although that could change. The change won’t be easy or pleasant. I do not believe that the elite beneficiaries of globalization will give up what they have gained without a fight.

]]>