Comments on: Visual pollution and the mental environment/2007/09/24/assaulting-visual-pollution/Andrew Curry's blog on futures, trends, emerging issues and scenariosThu, 14 Jul 2011 15:38:41 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.com/By: feedback [ barry r. jones ] » Visual Pollution/2007/09/24/assaulting-visual-pollution/#comment-3011Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:38:41 +0000/2007/09/24/assaulting-visual-pollution/#comment-3011[…] to read and consider: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_pollution /2007/09/24/assaulting-visual-pollution/  http://www.dunnfoundation.org/vp/index.html Posted on July 14, 2011 by admin. This entry was […]

]]>
By: Living without outdoor advertising « thenextwave/2007/09/24/assaulting-visual-pollution/#comment-1871Sun, 24 Feb 2008 22:49:52 +0000/2007/09/24/assaulting-visual-pollution/#comment-1871[…] without outdoor advertising I blogged a few months ago about Sao Paulo’s decision to ban billboards, in the context of the Culture Jammers’ campaign against what it calls the […]

]]>
By: thenextwavefutures/2007/09/24/assaulting-visual-pollution/#comment-1436Fri, 12 Oct 2007 22:13:32 +0000/2007/09/24/assaulting-visual-pollution/#comment-1436According to this week’s Economist, the American promotional and advertising agency Clear Channel is suing Sao Paulo in the belief that the outdoor advertising ban is unconstitutional – apparently because it would be in the United States. (Although the Economist story notes that there are bans in Vermont, Maine, Hawai’i, and Alaska, and many towns.) Sao Paolo, they say, is an extreme example of a growing trend worldwide. Andrew

]]>
By: jeremy/2007/09/24/assaulting-visual-pollution/#comment-1402Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:53:52 +0000/2007/09/24/assaulting-visual-pollution/#comment-1402excellent post, all too true. As an advertiser I say it’s better to wipe away the outdoor advertising as well. We’re all over saturated.

]]>